RIYAZ AHMAD TANTRAY v. THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD TH.ITS CHAIRMAN AND ORS
WP(C)/940/2025 · 2025-04-29
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7051 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7051 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 178 Suppl. List IN HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) No. 940/2025 CM No. 2486/2025 Riyaz Ahmad Tantray …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. M. Ashraf Wani, Advocate Vs. The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. Through its Chairman and Ors. ...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Adil Asmi, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE.
ORDER 29.04.2025
01. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner, when confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition, submits that he would feel satisfied, if the respondents are directed to treat the instant petition as representation on behalf of the petitioner by according due consideration thereon within some reasonable time frame, to which, learned counsel for the respondents has no objection provided the same is accorded due consideration in accordance with law.
02. With the consensus of learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is taken on Board and dispose of at its threshold stage by directing the respondents 1 and 2 to treat this petition as representation on behalf of the petitioner and take decision thereon strictly under rules and as per law within a period of six weeks from
the date a copy of this Order along with a copy of petition and annexures are made available to them. The order of consideration which is likely to be passed by the respondents on the representation of the petitioners shall be forwarded to the petitioners by registered post.
03. Disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 29.04.2025
“Shamim Dar”