MRS BALAMANI JAYAPRAKASH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/12389/2022 · 2025-08-29
R Devdas
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70504 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70504 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33567 WP No. 12389 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 12389 OF 2022 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
MRS. BALAMANI JAYAPRAKASH W/O MR K JAYAPRAKASH MENON, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT MANI DEEPAM, KIZHAKKETHARA ERIMAYUR-II, PALLAVUR, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD, KERALA-678688 REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER, SRI N B ASHOK KUMAR, …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHYAM PRASHANTHA S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVAN, BENGALURU-560001.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION, KANDAYA BAHVAN, BENGALURU-560001
4.
THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU EAST TALUK, K R PURAM, BENGALURU-560036
Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33567 WP No. 12389 of 2022
5.
SMT CHIKKA AMMAIAH W/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
6.
H R RADHAMMA W/O LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
7.
SRI SINDHUKUMAR S/O LATE VANKATESH AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS
8.
SRI SRIKANTH S/O LATE VANKATESH AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS
9.
SRI BABU S/O LATE VANKATESH AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS REP BY HIS NATURAL MOTHER AS MINOR GUARDIAN SMT H R RADHAMMA
10. SRI C N ANJANAPPA S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
11. SMT NAGAVENI AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS W/O LATE NARAYANAPPA NO.5 TO 11 ARE R/A CHOKKASANDRA VILLAGE SARJAPURA HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK 562106
12. SRI K RAJENDRAN S/O LATE V KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT NO. 59 KRUMBIGAL ROAD BANGALORE 560004 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4)
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33567 WP No. 12389 of 2022
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
ORDER DTD.31.10.2018 PASSED IN CASE NO.R.A.(BE) 424/ 2016-17 BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER NORTH SUB DIVISION AT BENGALURU PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND DIRECT THE R-2 TO 4 TO ENTER THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN THE RTC AND IN ALL THE REVENUE RECORDS IN RESPECT OF PETITIONERS SCHEDULE PROPERTY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4. Notice to the other respondents is not necessary for the following reason: Learned High Court Government Pleader submits that the petitioner is seeking to raise a challenge to an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. The
order is passed on 31.10.2018.
2. Since alternative and efficacious remedy is available for the petitioner to approach the Deputy
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33567 WP No. 12389 of 2022
Commissioner seeking revision under Section 136(3) of the Act, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Deputy Commissioner.
3. Office to return the original documents/certified copies, if any, to the petitioner while retaining a copy of the same for the file.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
DL CT: JL