Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70477 (ALL)

NAGENDRA KUMAR SONKER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/21328/2025 · 2025-07-15

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Vinod Diwakar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:114339-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21328 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nagendra Kumar Sonker Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J. 1. Heard Shri Mahendra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for State respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondents to provide the compensation of the acquired land, which was utilized by the respondents under relevant provisions of Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in respect of petitioner's land acquired by respondent authority. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the dispute falls within the jurisdiction of the District Level Committee constituted by the Government Order dated 12.5.2016 and as such no interference is required by this Court in the instant matter at this stage. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the issue involved, with the consent of parties herein, the writ petition stands disposed of with the observation that in case the petitioner moves a fresh representation ventilating his grievances before the authority concerned constituted under the Government Order dated 12.05.2016 within two weeks, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks, thereafter. Order Date :- 16.7.2025 NLY Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad