p. 1 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK F.A.O. No. 371 of 2024 New India Assurance Company Ltd. …. Petitioner(s) Mr. B. Dasmohapatra, Advocate -versus- Bapina Nayak & another …. Opp. Party(s) Mr. K. Panigrahi, Advocate Respondent No.1 CORAM: JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA Order No. ORDER 03.03.2025 I.A. No. 133 of 2025 , 05. 1. This is an application filed by respondent no.1-Bapina Nayak for modification of the order dated 14.02.2025 passed in FAO No. 371 of 2024, as his name has been wrongly written as “Bipina Nayak” instead of “Bapina Nayak”. 2. In the appeal memo inadvertently the name of the respondent no.1 has also been written as “Bipina Nayak” instead of “Bapina Nayak”. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he would correct the name of the respondent no.1 in the memorandum of appeal. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, learned counsel for p. 2 p. 2 the appellant is permitted to correct the name of respondent no.1 in the memorandum of appeal within two days. Once the name of the respondent no.1 is corrected in the memorandum of appeal, the order dated 14.02.2025 shall also be corrected accordingly by the Registry. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the I.A. is disposed of. 6. Rest part of the order dated 14.02.2025 remains unaltered. (S.S. Mishra) Judge Ashok MOHAPATRA