Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7046 (GAU)

BISHNU BAHADUR LIMBU @ BISHNU LIMBU v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS.

WP(C)/668/2018 · 2025-03-20

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010024142018 2025:GAU-AS:3134 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/668/2018 BISHNU BAHADUR LIMBU @ BISHNU LIMBU S/O. LT. KRISHNA LIMBU, R/O. HALLAWKHOWA DEOPANI, P.O. AND P.S. BORPATHAR, DIST. KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPTT. OF HOME AFFAIRS, DISPUR, GHY. 2:THE DY. COMMISSIONER KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM DIPHU 3:SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE BOKAJAN KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM 4:OFFICER IN CHARGE BORPATHAR POLICE STATION KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM DIPHU 5:SRI PHONIDHAR BORA S/O. LT. HARI CHANDRA BORA R/O. HOLLAWKHOWA KALIBARI Page No.# 2/3 P.O. AND P.S. BORPATHAR DIST. KARBI ANGLONG ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M CHOUDHURY, MR P HAZARIKA,MR T R SARMA,MR A K BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MS. SOMILA,MR. P DAIMARY,MR. B DEORI,MR. S K DEORI BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 21-03-2025 1. When the matter was listed on 23.03.2021, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the pendency of this writ petition, the petitioner had expired and accordingly, this Court granted time to file substitution petition. Thereafter, though the matter was listed again on 09.11.2021, no such substitution petition was filed. 2. Mr. K.D. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though a letter was sent by Mr.A.K.Borah, learned Advocate to the son of the deceased petitioner through registered post with A/D intimating him for requirement of filing of substitution petition, however, till date, he has not received any instruction in this regard. 3. In view of the aforesaid, this Court is left with no option to close the present writ petition for want of substitution, accordingly, the present writ petition stands closed. 4. It is needless to say that the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner shall be at Page No.# 3/3 liberty to file necessary application, if so desires for restoration of this petition and substitution. 5. A copy of the communication issued by the learned Advocate for the petitioner is kept on record. JUDGE Comparing Assistant