AKASHDEEP SINGH AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR
CRM-M/38699/2020 · 2025-02-10
Namit Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70449 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70449 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE 246
Akashdeep Singh State of Punjab
CORAM : HON Present: Mr.
for t
Mr.
Mr. Mr.
Lega *** NAMIT KUMA
1.
The quashing of FIR IPC registered at proceedings arisi
2.
Lear the matter has b compromise, lea petition with libe basis of comprom
3.
Dism
February 10, 20 Pankaj*
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH
CRM-M
Date of De Singh and another
Versus and another
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Yuvraj Singh Tiwana, AAG, Pu Mr. Kamaldeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate Legal aid counsel for respondent No ***
UMAR, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed f FIR No.114 dated 21.06.2020 registe ered at Police Station Khalra, District s arising therefrom.
Learned counsel for the petitioners a has been compromised between the se, learned counsel for petitioners w ith liberty to file a fresh petition seek mpromise. Dismissed as withdrawn with afores
, 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
NJAB AND HARYANA AT ARH M No.38699 of 2020
e of Decision:10.02.2025
... Petitioners
... Respondents AMIT KUMAR G, Punjab. ate for ent No.2. filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for registered under Sections 363, 366, 34 istrict Tarn Taran and all subsequen oners and respondent No.2 submit tha n the parties and in view of the said ners wishes to withdraw the presen n seeking quashing of the FIR on the aforesaid liberty.
(NAMIT KUMAR)
JUDGE ned : Yes/No
: Yes/No
s .C. for 66, 34 equent it that e said present on the PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.02.13 11:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh