Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70434 (MAD)

VISHAL v. The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/20031/2025 · 2025-07-16

M Nirmal Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.20031 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 16.07.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.20031 of 2025 Vishal ... Petitioner Vs. The Inspector of Police, D-3, Ice House Police Station, Chennai District. (Crime No.39 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439(1)(b) of Cr.P.C. 1973, to modify the condition that “The petitioners are ordered to be enlarged on bail on their production of bond for Rs.15,000/- only with 2 sureties. Out of the 2 sureties, one surety should be blood surety and another surety should be a solvent surety residing within the local limits of Greater Chennai Corporation” imposed in Crl.M.P.No.6764 of 2025 dated 22.05.2025 passed by the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate Court- Egmore”. For Petitioner : M/s.P.Muthamizhselvakumar For Respondent : Mr.C.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.20031 of 2025 O R D E R This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking modification of the conditions imposed by the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate Court- Egmore in Crl.M.P.No.6764 of 2025 dated 22.05.2025. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that learned II Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore in Crl.M.P.No.6764 of 2025 has granted bail to the petitioner with a condition that "the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his production of bond for Rs.15,000/- along with 2 sureties. Out of the 2 sureties, one surety should be blood surety and another surety should be a solvent surety residing within the local limits of Greater Chennai Corporation''. Now, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is ready to provide two blood sureties and was not in a position to provide solvent surety residing within the local limits of Greater Chennai Corporation and despite the bail being granted on 22.05.2025, the petitioner is still in prison. Hence, he prayed for suitable modification. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.20031 of 2025 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court modifies the above conditions to the effect that “the petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his production of bond for Rs.15,000/- along with two blood related sureties. 4. With the above observations and directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered. The other conditions shall remain unaltered. 16.07.2025 cda To 1. The II Metropolitan Magistrate Court-Egmore. 2. The Inspector of Police, D-3, Ice House Police Station, Chennai District. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.20031 of 2025 M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. cda/sma Crl.O.P.No.20031 of 2025 16.07.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis