Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70430 (KAR)

SRI. G. N. RAJANNA v. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

WP/27302/2023 · 2025-11-17

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47126 WP No. 27302 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.27302 OF 2023 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. G. N. RAJANNA S/O. LATE SRI. NINGE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, FOREST CONTRACTOR, NO. 15212, OOTY ROAD, GUNDURAO NAGAR, BAIRAVESHWAR NAGAR, MYSORE, KARNATAKA, PHONE NO 9008740112, THROUGH ADVOCATE, RAVIKIRAN P. PAWAR AND KRUTTIKA P. PAWAR, NO. B 14-89, TYPE-1, BDA 2ND PHASE, (NEAR NEW KSCA STADIUM), ALUR, BENGALURU NORTH-562 162, KARNATAKA, MOBILE 7676138608, EMAIL rkdigeox@gmail.com …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVIKIRAN P. PAWAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47126 WP No. 27302 of 2023 DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU -560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST (DCF) MANDYA DIVISION, MANDYA-571 401, KARNATAKA. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE RESPONDENT NO.2 BEARING NUMBER B1/BUD/TENDER/CR-88/2022-23 DATED 05.09.2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-Y. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Taking into consideration the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the prayer - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47126 WP No. 27302 of 2023 made by the petitioner in this writ petition has become infructuous, the writ petition is accordingly, disposed of. 3. However, it is made clear that there is no impediment for the petitioner to avail such other relief before the learned Arbitrator, in the concerned Arbitration case. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 55