Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70426 (ALL)

COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT JANTA ADARSH MADHYAMIK VIDYALAY SYARLI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIC/21395/2025 · 2025-08-05

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:133177 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21395 of 2025 Petitioner :- Committee Of Management Janta Adarsh Madhyamik Vidyalay Syarli And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bachchu Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Grijesh Tiwari,Hritudhwaj Pratap Sahi Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. Heard Sri H.N. Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Bachchu Lal Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri G.K. Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by H.P. Sahi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 4, 6, 7 & 8. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayer :- "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 30.05.2025 passed by the Deputy Registrar, Firms, Societies & Chits, Meerut and also other consequential order, if any. (Annexure No. 12)" 3. After arguing at length on the merits of the case, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of petitioners submits that the petitioners may be given liberty to approach the prescribed authority challenging the election disputes and also the prescribed authority be directed to decide the said dispute raised by the petitioner, expeditiously. 4. Learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 3, 4, 6, 7 & 8 has opposed the instant prayer made in the writ petition. But he has not objected the prayer as made by learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners during the argument for granted liberty to approach the prescribed authority to adjudicate the entire election dispute between the parties after giving opportunity of hearing to the affected parties within a time bound manner. 5. In view of above, this Court is of the opinion that the aforesaid prayer made by learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of petitioner be allowed and the matter is remitted back to the prescribed authority to decide the dispute between the parties. However, the petitioner is directed to approach the prescribed authority by way of filing reference/application within a period of two weeks from today and the prescribed authority is directed to decide the reference/application after giving opportunity of hearing to all the affected parties and considering the materials on record, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of reference/application. 6. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 6.8.2025 sailesh Digitally signed by :- SAILESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad