AAMIR KHAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/6481/2025 · 2025-06-23
Harkesh Manuja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70404 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70404 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CRWP No.6481 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 221 CRWP No.6481 of 2025 Date of Decision: 23.06.2025 Aamir Khan and another ......Petitioners Vs State of Haryana and others
...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate for the petitioners. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) [1]. Present criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners praying for protection to their life and liberty, in view of the marriage solemnized by them against the wishes of respondent Nos.4 to 11. [2]. Upon advance notice, Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Deputy A.G., Haryana appears on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. Requisite copies of the petition have already been supplied to the respondent-State by the learned counsel for the petitioners. [3]. Paper-book reveals that marriage of petitioner Nos.1 and 2 was solemnized on 11.06.2024. The documents annexed by the petitioners with the petition including their Aadhar Cards (Annexures P-2 and P-3) show that both are major and duly identified by their counsel, but apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 11.
DIWAKER GULATI 2025.06.23 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 CRWP No.6481 of 2025 [4]. Apprehending threat to their life and liberty, petitioners have already approached respondent No.2 by way of representation dated 12.06.2025 (Annexure P-4). [5]. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of, with a direction to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, District Nuh to look into the representation dated 12.06.2025 (Annexure P-4) and in case he finds any threat perception to the petitioners, appropriate steps be taken to protect their life and liberty and also ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners by forcibly taking them in custody on the allegations that petitioner No.2 has been kidnapped, abducted or raped by petitioner No.1. [6]. However, it is made clear that this order may not be construed as expression of an opinion on legality and validity of the marriage of the petitioners. [7]. In case any criminal case is pending against petitioner No.1, this order shall not be any hindrance for the Investigating agency to proceed according to law.
(HARKESH MANUJA) 23.06.2025 JUDGE d.gulati Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No DIWAKER GULATI 2025.06.23 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document