Supp 1 S. No. 82 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 879/2025 Shahida Majeed And Anr. … Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Asif, Advocate. V/s UT of J&K (Home) and Ors. … Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, Dy.AG CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE ORDER 22.04.2025 1. The petitioners seek a direction upon official respondents to provide them the police protection as they apprehend danger to their lives from respondents 6 and 7 owing to the reason of having married against the wishes of said respondents 6 and 7. 2. It is submitted that the petitioners are major and out of their free will they got married. Copy of Nikahnama has been placed on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners refers to the decision of the Supreme Court passed in case titled as in Lata Singh v. State of U.P. and another 2006 (5) SCC 475, and would submits that in absence of there being any legal impediment, the petitioners are entitled to marry according to their choice and the official respondents are duty bound to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners. 4. Any person having attained the age of majority is entitled to contract the marriage as per his/her wishes and the police is duty bound to protect the life and liberty, if approached. However, it appears that the petitioners have not ever approached the official respondents for their indulgence in the matter for providing protection to them. 5. In this view of the matter, this petition is disposed of, at this stage, by providing that the official respondents shall look into the grievance of the petitioners for providing them adequate security and to ensure that nobody interferes in their married life, if they approach them. 6. It is made clear that no opinion has been expressed with regard to the validity of their marriage. 7. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGE Srinagar 22-04-2025 Ishaq