MONIKA GAUTAM v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/366/2025 · 2025-03-10
Jayant Banerji
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7037 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7037 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35583 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 366 of 2025 Petitioner :- Monika Gautam Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akshay Raghuvanshi,B.K.Singh Raghuvanshi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents.
2. Pursuant to the previous order passed by this Court on 10.2.2025, learned Standing Counsel has obtained instructions and has stated on the basis thereof that there is every possibility, given the previous conduct of the petitioner, that she would try to influence the inquiry unduly that would effect its outcome.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has produced the instructions for perusal of the Court received from the Labour Commissioner, UP sent by means of a letter dated 17..2.2025, which is taken on record.
4. Since there is material that is cogent for attaching the petitioner to Pratapgrah and the Additional Commissioner, Kanpur Region, Kanpur is conducting the departmental enquiry, I see no reason to interfere in the matter of attachment of the petitioner to Pratapgrah. It is the discretion of the authorities to pass appropriate orders for conducting the enquiry.
5. For the reasons aforesaid, this writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 S.K.S. Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad