- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50175 WP No. 2530 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 2530 OF 2023 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. PUTTASWAMY S/O POOJARI EREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/O SOGALAPALYA CHANNAPATNA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562138 2. SRI MUTHACHAR S/O CHIKKANNACHAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED R/O SOGALAPALYA CHANNAPATNA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562138 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H.N. BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ASST REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES RAMANAGARA SUB DIVISION RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA-562159 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SOGALAPALYA MILK PRODUCERS CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES LTD SOGALAPALYA VILLAGE VIRUPAKSHAPURA HOBLI CHANNAPATNA TALUK-562138 RAMANAGARA DISTRICT Digitally signed by PRASHANTH N V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50175 WP No. 2530 of 2023 3. SMT YASHODAMMA D/O KUNNE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O SOGALAPALYA VILLAGE CHANNAPATNA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562138 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. CHANDINI .S., HCGP FOR R1 R2 & 3 - SD/-) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 I.E., THE ASST. REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, RAMANAGARA SUB-DIVISION, RAMANAGARA DATED 23/09/2022 IN DISPUTE NO. SA.SA.SA.NI.RA.-46/DAVA/11/2022-23 AS PER ANNEXURE-D. AND ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR MANDAMUS DECLARING THAT THE R-1 HAS NO AUTHORITY TO INVOKE THE PROVISION UNDER SECTION 70 OF THE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT AND ENTERTAIN THE DISPUTE IN RELATING TO PRIMARY MEMBERSHIP OF A CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY IN VIEW OF EXPRESS PROVISION PROVIDED UNDER SECTION 16 AND 17 OF THE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT. AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50175 WP No. 2530 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that the petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the petition may be dismissed as having rendered infructuous. 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE PNV CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16