Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70353 (MAD)

S.NANTHINI v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ST) (FAC)

WP/23521/2025 · 2025-06-30

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:MHC:1774 WP No. 23521 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-06-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP No. 23521 of 2025 and WMP No. 26409 of 2025 S.Nanthini Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Deputy Commissioner (ST) (FAC) 161, Meenakshi Sundharanar Salai, Erode- 638 001. 2.The Joint Commissioner (ST) (FAC) 161, Meenakshi Sundharanar Salai, Erode Division, Erode- 638 001. 3.The Chairman Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission TNPSC Road, Chennai-600 003. Respondent(s) PRAYER Calling for the entire records pertaining to the suspension order dated 04.04.2025 in Roc. No.4958/2023/A1 issued by the first respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in Page No.1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23521 of 2025 service. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Boopal For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Selvi, Govt.Advocate For R1 & R2 Mr.G.Hema, S.C., For R3 ORDER The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the order of suspension dated 04.04.2025 and seeking a direction to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was placed under suspension on 04.04.2025 based on an allegation that his community certificate is fake. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner's actual community is not in dispute, as he belongs to the Katunayakkan Community. The issue raised by the respondents pertains only to the place where the certificate was secured and not the petitioner's Page No.2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23521 of 2025 community itself. 3. However, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents would submit that they are contemplating disciplinary proceedings. Taking into consideration the seriousness of the issue, this Court do not find any public interest to interfere with the suspension, which is reasonable. Hence, this Court does not find any merit in the petition. 4. Nevertheless, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to conclude the disciplinary proceedings within a period of four (4) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and if the petitioner wishes to request a change of headquarters, the petitioner is at liberty to file an application before the concerned authorities. Page No.3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23521 of 2025 5. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 30-06-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No Jeni To 1.The Deputy Commissioner (ST) (FAC) 161, Meenakshi Sundharanar Salai, Erode- 638 001. 2.The Joint Commissioner (ST) (FAC) 161, Meenakshi Sundharanar Salai, Erode Division, Erode- 638 001. 3.The Chairman Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission Tnpsc Road, Chennai-03. Page No.4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23521 of 2025 C.KUMARAPPAN J. Jeni WP No. 23521 of 2025 30-06-2025 Page No.5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis