!"# $ # & (,- (( + & 4 && ( 1 ) # $%6789 " & :;<9 !"!% "& )(? 1 "& !( "& ;+ *1 !.'1 ((& "& ( ( !*?1 !! + , ( '( -, (,-, + ''( *('(', 8 '* 4(* *+( (.(* .(' /, ( * ,(( 3(+ , & 51 4(* ( ( && 1 *( , ( / A "0 = '((# && 2 &&&&(( &&& !% $!:=$! > (? (* 1 !!@1 & (( ( ('( ( )*+ *+ (, ,(' && 5& '* /' 0 * (,0 *1 21 (, . (1 4(' ( ( ' 51 5&& 5& < ( ! "# $$% & PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.01.13 18:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. ' ()&& && ( ( ? ( /!3 ,( & 5& ((+ (1 * !,( C, (( '(',' (' + 5. Ltd. And An 5B, ha / 0 &&;& B & 5/50 ; B& (** /!3 B01 (,(( * ( + 1 ( .+ ( '(('**+ ( 20& 8 '*1 ( 4* (( ( '( , ?( 8 '*1 ( ** . .( =',( ( '((,?( ' ''(*(+& ! ?( ' ( ,(((. (+1 .(( 1 (-(* *(1 ?( 1 4( ?( ( '1 * ( ' ( ( #+,(-"# 8( A$ 52& Hon’ble the Supreme Court in nd Another vs. Sh. Masood Ahmed had held that the face of an orde & * *$%#"#'%* * .1 *1 ( *(* 1 ( (( .( * ('( , ((1 ('( ( (. (& ('(1 ,( *? ,& ( '(( ' + ,( '+1 *(,( (( (* ( '(( ( .(4& ?( '( '*(, '' *. ' ' ('(* %* #$$%&' * $%# urt in M/s Kranti Associates Pvt. hmed Khan and Others /0 n order passed by a quasi-judicial PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.01.13 18:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. authority or parties, must The authoriti an order, wh The principle 6. decisions, to making proce effectively b institution. ity or even an administrative autho , must speak and must not be like the thorities are under a legal obligation t er, which are the essence and virtuall inciples, as relevant to the present case “a. In India the judicial record reasons, even in ad such decisions affect anyo b. A quasi-judicial author support of its conclusions. c. Insistence on recordin serve the wider principle o not only be done it must well. d. Recording of reasons restraint on any possib judicial and quasi-judicia power. e. xx f. Reasons have virtually b component of a decisi observing principles of n quasi-judicial and even by xx l. Reasons in support of d clear and succinct. A ‘rubber-stamp reasons’ is valid decision making pro xx Administrative authorities mus ns, to help to curb arbitrariness and processes, which not only assists the vely but prevents a revolving doo authority affecting the rights of e the 'inscrutable face of a Sphinx. ation to give reasons while passing virtually a part of the due process. nt case, laid down therein read thus: dicial trend has always been to n in administrative decisions, if t anyone prejudicially. authority must record reasons in usions. cording of reasons is meant to ciple of justice that justice must must also appear to be done as asons also operates as a valid possible arbitrary exercise of judicial or even administrative xx xx tually become as indispensable a decision making process as s of natural justice by judicial, ven by administrative bodies. xx xx rt of decisions must be cogent, t. A pretence of reasons or ns’ is not to be equated with a ng process. xx xx” s must record reasons for their ss and ensure fairness in decision- ts the Court in scrutinising the case g door of appeals to the same PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.01.13 18:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. & ( ( * ( (+ & ' & && 2 . ?, ! ** .1 ( ( ('1 ' !** ! ( ( * , (+ ( ((1 4( < ( '*(( ( 3( (( =( & ?(- # > - % * # > - % 5 && ( ' ( , '(( (+ ?( ,/01 + ( (( ( 5 ,& . (. ** ,( '& PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.01.13 18:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.