LALMAN ALIAS RAJNATH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
NA528/23152/2025 · 2025-08-05
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70351 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70351 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:133665 Court No. - 74 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 23152 of 2025 Applicant :- Lalman Alias Rajnath Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vikas Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Heard Sri Vikas Yadav, learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. The present application under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash the order dated 16.05.2025 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Mau in Execution (Maintenance) Case No.533 of 2023 (Savita Yadav and others Vs. Lalman @ Rajnath Yadav), arising out of an application under Section 128 Cr.P.C., whereby recovery warrant/arrest warrant/recovery certificate have been issued.
Learned counsel for the applicant wants time to deposit the arrears of maintenance amount before the court concerned in installments. After some argument, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present application under Section 528 BNSS may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the applicant to file appropriate application to fix the installments before the court of competent jurisdiction. In view of the statement of learned counsel for the applicant, the present application 528 BNSS is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the applicant to file appropriate application to fix the installments before the court of competent jurisdiction. Office is directed to return the certified copy of impugned order to
learned counsel for the applicant.
Order Date :- 6.8.2025 Kpy Digitally signed by :- KAVLESHWAR PRASAD YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad