Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:6577-DB Court No. - 46 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 470 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vijay Pal Bhati And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Srivastava,Syed Mohammad Abbas Husain Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J. 1. Shri Amit Kumar, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.4 today in Court, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for respondent no. 4, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 3. Although, the prayer made in this writ petition is to quash the FIR dated 25.11.2024, arising out of Case Crime No. 274 of 2024, under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) of B.N.S., Police Station Kasna, District Gautam Budh Nagar, but when the matter has been taken up, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that all the offences, complained of, are punishable up to seven years and therefore, before effecting the arrest of the petitioners, specific provisions contained in Section 35 of B.N.S.S. be strictly complied with in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in several judgments. 4. We have perused the first information report, which prima facie discloses the cognizable offence against the petitioners and therefore, the prayer made to quash the first information report cannot be entertained in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the cases of State of Telangana Vs. Habib Abdullah Jellani reported in (2017) 2 SCC 779 and Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others reported in (2021) SCC Online SC 315 and as such, we are of the view that no interference is warranted. 5. However, considering the fact that all the offences, complained of in the impugned first information report, are punishable with a term up to seven years, therefore, in case of effecting the arrest of the petitioners in pursuance of the impugned first information report, it is directed that the respondents/ authorities shall ensure that the specific provisions contained in Section 35 of B.N.S.S. and the guidelines issued by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 as well as the directions issued in judgement and order dated 28.01.2021 of this Court passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 17732 of 2020 (Vimal Kumar and 3 Others Vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others) reported in 2021 (2) ACR 1147, be strictly complied with. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 15.1.2025 Ujjawal Digitally signed by :- UJJAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad