Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70341 (ALL)

KAMLESH PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P.

NABAIL/5280/2025 · 2025-08-03

Vivek Varma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:130658 Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 5280 of 2025 Applicant :- Kamlesh Prasad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Abhijeet Kumar Pandey,Indar Kumar Chaubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. 1. Heard counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 2. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.280 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 109, 115(2), 352, 333 B.N.S., Police Station Bariyarpur, District Deoria. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. As per the first information report, the applicant along with eleven named accused is alleged to have assaulted eight persons. As per the medical report of seven injured, the injuries sustained by them were simple in nature. Injured Dhurendra received a grievous injury on his head. A vague and general role has been assigned to the applicant. The applicant has not been nominated as the principal offender who caused the grievous injury on the head of the injured Dhurendra. It is next contended that identically placed co-accused Chote Lal and Bittu have been granted interim protection by this Court vide order dated 12.3.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.4727 of 2025 (Chote Lal and 2 others vs. State of U.P. and 3 others). At this stage, there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. It is next submitted that the investigation is going on and the applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report. 6. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicant and the fact that a vague and general role has been assigned to the applicant; the applicant has not been nominated as the principal offender who caused the grievous injury on the head of the injured Dhurendra; identically placed co-accused Chote Lal and Bittu have been granted interim protection by this Court; at this stage, there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report. 7. In the event of arrest, the applicant-Kamlesh Prasad be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193(3) B.N.S.S., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him, before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned. 8. In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant. 9. The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 10. The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order. 11. The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 4.8.2025 #Vik/- Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad