IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.2437 of 2025 Date of Decision: 21.03.2025 _______________________________________________________ Dr. Vipan Garg …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. K.B.Khajuria, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents-State. Mr. V.B. Verma, Central Government Counsel, for respondent No. 4. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that present petition has been rendered infructuous on account of subsequent developments and as such, same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. p (Sandeep Sharma), Judge March 21, 2025 (Sunil) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?