Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7033 (RAJ)

SHANKARLAL S/O KALYAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2232/2025 · 2025-02-27

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8645] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2044/2025 Sanwarmal @ Sanwra S/o Kalulal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Semli Jagir, Police Station Kamkhera, District Jhalawar (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail At Aklera). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2232/2025 Shankarlal S/o Kalyan, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Khanpuriya Police Station Ghatoli District Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Jhala (SB Crl.M.B. No.2044/2025) Mr. Rohit Khandelwal (SB Crl.M.B. No.2232/2025) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 27/02/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed by petitioners under Section 483 of the BNSS in connection with FIR No.382/2023 registered at Police Station Manohar Thana, District Jhalawar for offence(s) under Sections 8/15, 8/25 & 8/29 of the NDPS Act. 2. Counsel for petitioners submits that both petitioners have been made accused with the aid of Section 29 of the NDPS Act on [2025:RJ-JP:8645] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2044/2025] the basis of statements of co-accused Manoj Kumar, which has already been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 16.01.2025; petitioners are in custody since 28.01.2025 and 22.01.2025, hence, on the ground of parity, petitioners be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor, having assistance with the Investigating Officer, has opposed the bail applications and submits that the charge-sheet has not been filed. 4. After arguing for some time, counsel for petitioners do not want to press the bail applications at this stage and seeks permission to withdraw the same with liberty to file a fresh before the Sessions Court after submission of charge-sheet. 5. Accordingly, these bail applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /6-7