COCP-323 IN THE HI 114 Waqar Ahme Anish Yadav CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in CW Haryana and submissions 01.07.2025 i the concerne the compete receipt of the 2. of Sh. Anish Haryana, Ch 3. submits that 323-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o r Ahmed Khurshid Versus Yadav and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 08.09.2025 (Annex CWP-26443-2025, titled as ‘Waqar and others’ whereby the writ peti ssions of learned counsel for the State 25 is already being looked into by t erned area and appropriate order o petent authority within a period of t of the copy of this order’. Compliance report dated 15.05. Anish Yadav, Director, Development na, Chandigarh/respondent No. 1 is tak At the very outset, learned cou ts that in compliance of the Writ C ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-323-2026 Date of Decision: 19.05.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA l. A.G., Haryana. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Waqar Ahmed Khurshid vs. State of rit petition was disposed of on the State that ‘the representation dated by the Sub Division Magistrate of der on the same will be passed by of three months from the date of 15.05.2026 filed by way of affidavit pment and Panchayats Department, 1 is taken on record. ed counsel for the respondent-State rit Court order dated 08.09.2025 ging Writ te of the ed of by of avit ent, tate 025 RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.21 19:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-323 (Annexure P been passed. 4. the case havi 5. 6. required to b of, according 7. challenge th advised. 8. 9. 19.05.2026 rishu 323-2026 -2- xure P-1), Speaking Order dated 12. assed. As such, nothing survives in the There is no representation on b se having been called twice. Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. Needless to say, the petition nge the aforesaid Speaking Order, in Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable 12.05.2026 (Annexure R-1) has s in the present petition. n on behalf of the petitioner despite above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed etitioner would be at liberty to der, in accordance with law, if so any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No has pite are sed to f so RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.21 19:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.