Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7033 (KAR)

SHRI H K SURESH S/O KORAVAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/105779/2024 · 2025-02-20

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3445 WP No. 105779 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 105779 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SHRI H.K.SURESH S/O. KORAVAPPA AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O. HACCHOLLI VILLAGE, SIRUGUPPA TALUK, BELLARY DISTRICT-583101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI B.C.JNANAYYA SWAMI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT REPT BY ITS SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-590001. 2. THE TAHASILDAR TAHASILDHAR OFFICE, SIRUGUPPA. 3. REVENUE INSPECTOR, SIRUGUPPA-583201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI M.M.KHANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTCLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER ANNEXURE-G DATED 26.08.2024 AND DIRECTED TO ENTER THE PETITIONER IN RECORD OF RIGHTS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.02.21 16:31:08 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3445 WP No. 105779 of 2024 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. Learned AGA accepts notice for respondents No.1 to 3. 2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: (1) A writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 authority to consider the representation of the petitioner Annexure-G dated 26.08.2024 and directed to enter the petitioner in record of rights. (2) Grant such other reliefs that this Hon’ble Court may deems fit in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 26.08.2024 at Annexure-G has not been considered despite an earlier order having been passed by the Tahashildar on 23.06.2021 directing the entry of name of the petitioner in column No.9 of the RTC relating to Sy.No.6 of Halekote village, Shiruguppa - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3445 WP No. 105779 of 2024 Taluka, District Ballari. When an order passed by the Tahashildar way back in the year 23.06.2021 that was required to be implemented within a reasonable period of time. Having not done so, the representation submitted by the petitioner on 26.08.2024 also has remained unconsidered. In that view of the matter, I pass the following : ORDER (a) Writ petition is allowed. (b) Writ of mandamus is issued directing respondent No.3 to act on the order passed by the Tahashildar dated 23.06.2021 at Annexure-F in terms of representation dated 26.08.2024 at Annexure-G within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE CKK, CT:GSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5