Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:111386 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22999 of 2025 Applicant :- Rishabh Singh Rajput Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajendra Kumar Pandey,Smt. Kirti Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Amit Kumar Rai,G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit, filed by learned counsel for the applicant, is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Rajendra Kr. Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Amit Kr. Rai, learned counsel for the first informant and Sri Pankaj Saxena, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed to enlarge the applicant on bail in case crime No. 56 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 109(1), 351(3), 352 BNS, P.S. Chitaipur, District Varanasi. 4. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that as per the allegations in the F.I.R. as well as in the statement of the victim/injured, general role has been assigned to the accused persons including the applicant for causing injury. As per the injury report of the injured, it is clear that only two punctured wounds were found at the abdomen which are not grievous in nature. It is further submitted that even otherwise no specific role has been assigned to any of the accused for causing injury of the punctured wounds. The applicant has explained his criminal history in the accompanying affidavit. He is languishing in jail since 22.4.2025. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the first informant and learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail, but could not dispute the aforesaid fact. 6. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 7. Let the applicant- Rishabh Singh Rajput, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 9. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Vandana Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad