Bibi Ishrat @ Ishrat Parween v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./4249/2025 · 2026-07-15
Sandeep Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7031 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7031 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4249 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2007 Thana- SALAKHUA District- Saharsa ====================================================== Bibi Ishrat @ Ishrat Parween D/O Late Md. Israr, W/O Shivagtullaha @ Md. Sibgatullaha Resident Of Village- Laxminiyan, O.P. Banma, P.S- Salkhua, Distt.- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Shivgatullah @ Md. Sibgatullah S/O Md. Harun R/O Village- Lakshminiya, P.S- Salkhua, Distt.- Saharsa.
3. Samira Khatoon @ Gulnaz Khatoon W/O Shivagtullaha @ Md. Sibgatullah R/O Village- Lakshminya, P.S- Salkhua, Distt.- Saharsa. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Majid Mahboob Khan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 15-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The present application has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 vide order 15.07.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 8805 of 2024.
3. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the condition for payment of Rs. 4,00,000/- has not been complied by the opposite party no. 2 and 3.
4. From the perusal of the Memorandum of Agreement arrived between the parties in the mediation, the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4249 of 2025(2) dt.15-07-2026 2/2 amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- was to be paid by the opposite party no. 2 and 3, but they have not done so.
5. In these circumstances, this application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court of the Magistrate in respect of bail cancellation petition on the ground mentioned above, and if such an application is filed the same shall be decided by the Magistrate concerned within fifteen days of its filing.
6. If it is found that the opposite parties have not paid the aforesaid amount to the petitioner then the bail bonds of the opposite parties should be cancelled by the Magistrate concerned without delaying the matter.
aarti/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T