{1} 12-CP-238-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 238 OF 2025 IN WP/6356/2024 Pankaj Govind Vasave ….Petitioner VERSUS Naina Gunde, Commissioner, Tribal Development Department …..Respondent ….. Mr. Nitin L. Chaudhari, Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. V.S. Chaudhari, AGP for State ....... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 24th NOVEMBER, 2025 ORDER : 1. By taking decision in the case of the petitioner, the respondent has complied with the order. 2. Learned advocate for the petitioner vehemently submitted that respondent was directed to take decision by taking into consideration the judicial pronouncement of this Court, which is not done in the case of the petitioner. 3. We cannot go into the merits of the order passed by the respondent. In view of compliance of the order, the contempt petition is disposed of. Bhagyawant Punde 2025:BHC-AUG:32216-DB {2} 12-CP-238-2025 4. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the said order by filing appropriate legal proceeding. (VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Bhagyawant Punde