Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70290 (PNJ)

DEEPAK KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/32739/2025 · 2025-08-18

Sanjay Vashisth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SUMIT SINGLA 2025.08.19 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M-32739-2025 -2- bonds and surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023” 3. Continuing his submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in compliance of the order dated 18.06.2025 passed by this Court, petitioner has joined the investigation, and has fully co-operated. Therefore, he prays for confirmation of the said interim anticipatory bail order. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions confirms the said averment made by counsel for the petitioner of joining the investigation on 24.07.2025 by the petitioner, and submits that as of now, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. Since, petitioner has already joined the investigation and custodial interrogation is no more required; ad-interim bail order dated 18.06.2025 passed by this Court is hereby made absolute. Accordingly, present petition is allowed. However, petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the terms and conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 7. Accordingly, petition stands disposed of. (SANJAY VASHISTH) 18.08.2025 JUDGE Sumit Singla Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO Whether Reportable: YES/NO SUMIT SINGLA 2025.08.19 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document