M/S MUMBAI VADA PAV v. JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
WP/12622/2022 · 2025-11-10
E S Indiresh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70285 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70285 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45595 WP No. 12622 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.12622 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
M/S. MUMBAI VADA PAV REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MR. V. SRINIVASA SHETTY NO. 652, 11TH MAIN, 4TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 011.
2.
MR. V. SRINIVASA SHETTY PROPRIETOR AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS M/S MUMBAI VADA PAV NO. 652, 11TH MAIN, 4TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 011.
3.
MRS. SWETA RATNAKAR SHETTY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS NO. 1835, 26/1, 1ST FLOOR 41ST CROSS, 9TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 069. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.B. TOTAD, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT THE FAIRWAY BUSSINESS PARK
Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45595 WP No. 12622 of 2022
NO.10/1, 11/2, AND 12/2B.
OFFICE AT DOMLUR KORAMANGALA INNER RING ROAD NEXT TO EMBASSY GOLF LINKS, CHALLAGHATTA BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER.
2.
M/S JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED REGIONAL OFFICE AT DIVYASHREE CHAMBERS NO.11, O SHAUGHNESSY ROAD 5TH FLOOR, A WING OFF LANGFORD ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 025. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. FRANCIS XAVIER, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 04.3.2022 AND 09.6.2022 OF THE PETITIONER PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-D AND E.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45595 WP No. 12622 of 2022
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. The petitioners have sought for a direction to the respondent - Bank to consider the representations as at Annexures - D and E. Since the respondents are not instrumentalities of the State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, the writ petition is dismissed.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40