Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70282 (ALL)

YAMEEN v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/23057/2025 · 2025-07-10

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110915 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23057 of 2025 Applicant :- Yameen Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Utkarsh Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Utkarsh Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Pankaj Saxena, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the trial in Case Crime No.114 of 2022, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 307, 504 IPC, Police Station- Nakur, District Saharanpur. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that though he was named in the FIR but police after investigation submitted final report against the applicant and charge sheet has been filed against the co-accused person. Subsequently, on the basis of statement of injured, the applicant was summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. Though as per the statement of injured, allegation of causing injuries has been made against Islam and no specific allegation has been made against the applicant for causing injuries to the injured. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 22.05.2024. Trial of the aforesaid case is going on and, in case, the applicant is released on bail, he will co-operate in the trial. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Yameen involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 11.7.2025 A.Kr. Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad