Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70281 (PNJ)

KAJAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/6431/2025 · 2025-06-18

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-6431 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 120 Kajal And Another State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent Nos. protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands o respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the wishes of their family members. 2. the Senior Superintendent of Police, Khanna directed to look into the representation dated made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. 3. and their dates of birth are Copies of aadhar 6431-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Kajal And Another Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Prashant Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioners. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent Nos. protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands o respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the wishes of their family members. Learned counsel states that the petitioners will be satisfied if Senior Superintendent of Police, Khanna directed to look into the representation dated made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. As per the averments made, both the petitioners are major and their dates of birth are 27.05.2007 and 11.06.2002 aadhar cards of the petitioners are appended as Annexures P -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6431-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 18.06.2025 ....Petitioners ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the Learned counsel states that the petitioners will be satisfied if Senior Superintendent of Police, Khanna i.e. respondent No.2 is directed to look into the representation dated 14.06.2025 (Annexure P-7), made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. As per the averments made, both the petitioners are major 27.05.2007 and 11.06.2002 respectively. of the petitioners are appended as Annexures P-1 PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.06.18 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-6431 and P-3, respectively. Certificate is enclosed with the petition as Annexure 4. 5. Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. objection in deciding the representation filed on behalf of the petitioners. 6. the petitioners and without going into the merits of their claim, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No. representation dated expeditiously, in accordance with law. 7. the authorities to proceed against the petitioners, in case, they are found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against them if there is some evidence that surfaces regarding their involvement in a cognizable offence, for which they may be required by the investigating agency 18.06.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaki Whether reportable 6431-2025 3, respectively. They got married on Certificate is enclosed with the petition as Annexure Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. objection in deciding the representation filed on behalf of the petitioners. In view of the limited prayer ma the petitioners and without going into the merits of their claim, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No. representation dated 14.06.2025 (Annexure P expeditiously, in accordance with law. It is however, made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities to proceed against the petitioners, in case, they are found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against if there is some evidence that surfaces regarding their involvement in a cognizable offence, for which they may be required by the investigating agency. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No -2- married on 14.06.2025 and the Marriage Certificate is enclosed with the petition as Annexure P-5. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and has no objection in deciding the representation filed on behalf of the petitioners. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of their claim, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to look into the 14.06.2025 (Annexure P-7) and decide the same It is however, made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities to proceed against the petitioners, in case, they are found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against if there is some evidence that surfaces regarding their involvement in a cognizable offence, for which they may be required by the (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.06.18 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.