IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1523 of 2025 ====================================================== 1. Vishwajeet Kumar Son of Virendra Kumar, resident of village, Post Office and Police Station - Mohiuddin Nagar, District- Samastipur. 2. Vedratna Kumar, Son of Virendra Kumar, resident of village, Post Office and Police Station - Mohiuddin Nagar, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Chief Engineer, Road Construction Department, N.H.Wing (North Bihar), Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, District - Samastipur. 4. The District Land Acquisition Officer, District - Samastipur. 5. The Executive Engineer, N.H. Wing, Road Construction Department, Bihar Sharif, District - Nalanda. 6. The Circle Officer, Mohiuddin Nagar, District - Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arvind Kumar, AC to Ex. GA-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 10-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This application has been filed for following reliefs: “For directing the respondents to remove the encroachment on the land which is acquired for Mahnar Mohiddin Nagar Bachhwara Path in Mauza Mohiuddin Nagar, Thana No. 198, Khesra No. 261, Entire Part of old Khesra No. 255 which was acquired by District Land Acquisition Office, Patna High Court CWJC No.1523 of 2025(2) dt.10-07-2026 2/2 Samastipur in the year of 1985 in Land Acquisition Case No. 83/1985-86.” 3. After some argument, counsel for the petitioners draws the attention of this Court towards one representation filed before Circle Officer, Mohiuddin Nagar, Samastipur and prays for a direction for disposal of the representation. 4. Without going into the merit of the case this Court directs the Circle Officer (respondent No.6) to consider the representation of the petitioners i.e., Annexure P/2 and pass a reasoned order after affording an opportunity to be heard within a period of six weeks from the date of this order. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. rishabh/atul (Ranjan Kumar Jha, J) U