MAHESH RAMKISHAN GURLE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS
WP/1035/2025 · 2025-01-20
Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7028 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7028 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
*1* 1nob wp1035o25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1035 OF 2025 MAHESH RAMKISHAN GURLE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS. … Shri Sunil M. Vibhute, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.S.S. Joshi, AGP for respondent Nos.1 and 2/State. Shri Anilkumar B. Dhongade, Advocate for respondent No.3. ...
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ.
DATE : 20th January, 2025 Per Court :- The papers are produced in view of the exigency being demonstrated.
2. The petitioner’s claim is pending with respondent No.2 Scrutiny Committee for validation of tribe certificate and simultaneously, respondent No.3 Employer has sought to terminate his services for non production of a certificate of validity within a week of the impugned communication dated 06.01.2025 (exhibit D).
3. We have heard the learned advocate for the 2025:BHC-AUG:1678-DB
*2* 1nob wp1035o25 petitioner, the learned AGP and the learned advocate Shri Dhongade who appears suo moto for respondent No.3 Employer.
4. The learned AGP, on instructions, submits that the Scrutiny Committee would decide the petitioner’s proposal within four weeks.
5. The Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Scrutiny Committee to decide the petitioner’s proposal within four weeks and restraining respondent No.3 Employer from terminating services during that period.
kps ( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)