Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70277 (KAR)

SHRI. C S VISHWNATHAM SETTY v. SHRI. K NARAYANA RAO

RFA/380/2018 · 2025-10-30

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43394 RFA No. 380 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.380 OF 2018 (SP) BETWEEN: SHRI. C.S.VISHWNATHAM SETTY S/O LATE SHRI. C. SUBBAIAH SETTY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT 675, RAGHAVENDRA BLOCK, SRINAGAR, BANGALORE. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VISHWANATH N AND SRI. VENKATESH, ADVOCATES ABSENT) AND: SHRI. K. NARAYANA RAO S/O LATE KASHI RAO, MAJOR IN AGE, R/AT NO 32, II CROSS, SYNDICATE BANK COLONY, MOODLAPALYA, BANGALORE - 560072 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. S.NAGESH, ADVOCATE) THIS RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20.01.2015 PASSED IN O.S.NO.914/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE XXX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, ALLOWING THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) TO (d) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43394 RFA No. 380 of 2018 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the respondent is present. Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed as default. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE SRA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11