SHRI. C S VISHWNATHAM SETTY v. SHRI. K NARAYANA RAO
RFA/380/2018 · 2025-10-30
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70277 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70277 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43394 RFA No. 380 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.380 OF 2018 (SP) BETWEEN:
SHRI. C.S.VISHWNATHAM SETTY S/O LATE SHRI. C. SUBBAIAH SETTY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT 675, RAGHAVENDRA BLOCK, SRINAGAR, BANGALORE. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VISHWANATH N AND SRI. VENKATESH, ADVOCATES ABSENT)
AND:
SHRI. K. NARAYANA RAO S/O LATE KASHI RAO, MAJOR IN AGE, R/AT NO 32, II CROSS, SYNDICATE BANK COLONY, MOODLAPALYA, BANGALORE - 560072
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. S.NAGESH, ADVOCATE)
THIS RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20.01.2015 PASSED IN O.S.NO.914/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE XXX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, ALLOWING THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER
ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) TO (d) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT.
Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43394 RFA No. 380 of 2018
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the respondent is present.
Learned counsel for the appellant is absent.
Consequently, the appeal is dismissed as default.
Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE
SRA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11