CWP-25809 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Kulwant Singh Union of India and others CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer Mandamus upon the respondents to release the amount of Rs.84,000/ deposited by the petitioner 1995. 2. informs this Court that, though the petitioner has annexed the requisite forms with the instant writ petition, but the same have not been submitted with respondent No.3 requisite forms with respondent No.3, any amount is found due, it shall be released, forthwith. 3. pursue the matter. 25809-2017 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Kulwant Singh Versus Union of India and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI None for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Tangri, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 3. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral) Through the instant writ petition, 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer Mandamus upon the respondents to release the amount of Rs.84,000/ deposited by the petitioner, under the Employees Provident Scheme, At the outset, learned counsel for informs this Court that, though the petitioner has annexed the requisite forms with the instant writ petition, but the same have not been submitted with respondent No.3. He asserts that in case, petitioner subm requisite forms with respondent No.3, the same any amount is found due, it shall be released, forthwith. Neither the petitioner, nor anyone on his behalf is present to pursue the matter. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-25809-2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 09.09.2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Gaurav Tangri, Advocate, Through the instant writ petition, filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a Mandamus upon the respondents to release the amount of Rs.84,000/-, as under the Employees Provident Scheme, earned counsel for respondents No.1 and 3 informs this Court that, though the petitioner has annexed the requisite forms with the instant writ petition, but the same have not been submitted . He asserts that in case, petitioner submits the the same will be considered, and if any amount is found due, it shall be released, forthwith. Neither the petitioner, nor anyone on his behalf is present to 5 s filed under Articles made for issuance of a as under the Employees Provident Scheme, respondents No.1 and 3 informs this Court that, though the petitioner has annexed the requisite forms with the instant writ petition, but the same have not been submitted its the be considered, and if Neither the petitioner, nor anyone on his behalf is present to AMIT KUMAR 2025.09.11 09:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-25809 4. instant writ petition, coupled with the submissions of learned counsel for respondent No.3, this Court is of the would be served by keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, the instant writ the requisite forms, on a prescribed format, with respondent No.3. In case, such an exercise is undertaken by the petitioner, respondent No.3 shall consider the same, and release the requis if found due. 09.09.202 Ak Sharma 25809-2017 (O&M) -2- Be that as it may, considering the issue involved in the instant writ petition, coupled with the submissions of learned counsel for respondent No.3, this Court is of the considered would be served by keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to submit the requisite forms, on a prescribed format, with respondent No.3. In case, such an exercise is undertaken by the petitioner, respondent No.3 consider the same, and release the requis if found due. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable ering the issue involved in the instant writ petition, coupled with the submissions of learned counsel for considered view that no purpose would be served by keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, the , with liberty to the petitioner to submit the requisite forms, on a prescribed format, with respondent No.3. In case, such an exercise is undertaken by the petitioner, respondent No.3 consider the same, and release the requisite amount to the petitioner, (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Yes Yes/No ering the issue involved in the instant writ petition, coupled with the submissions of learned counsel for view that no purpose would be served by keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, the , with liberty to the petitioner to submit the requisite forms, on a prescribed format, with respondent No.3. In case, such an exercise is undertaken by the petitioner, respondent No.3 ite amount to the petitioner, AMIT KUMAR 2025.09.11 09:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document