SRI. RAJESHWAR TUKARAM NETALKAR v. SRI. DIVAKAR S PAWASKAR
CCC/100286/2023 · 2025-02-12
B M Shyam Prasad, Ramachandra D Huddar
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7026 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7026 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2740-DB CCC No. 100286 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100286 OF 2023 BETWEEN:
SRI. RAJESHWAR TUKARAM NETALKAR AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, SHOP IN C.M.C BUILDING, 1365, ANKOLEKAR COMPOUND, DHOBIGHAT ROAD, KARWAR. …COMPLAINANT (BY MS. GAYATRI S.R., ADVOCATE AND SRI. T.M. NADAF, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI. DIVAKAR S. PAWASKAR, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BAILIFF ATTACHED TO PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE COURT, KARWAR. 2. SRI. TAMSE M. NAIK, AGA: MAJOR, OCC: LICENSED LOCK BREAKER, R/O HASALI, KARWAR-581301. 3. SRI. RAJESH A. MIRASHI, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: POLICE CONSTABLE, BEARING P.C.NO.1308, KARWAR TOWN POLICE STATION, KARWAR-581301. 4. SMT. SAVITA V. GUNAGA, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: WOMAN POLICE CONSTABLE, BEARING P.C.NO.314, KARWAR TOWN POLICE STATION, KARWAR-581301. Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2740-DB CCC No. 100286 of 2023
5. SRI. NILESH S/O PADMANABH DATTATREYA ANKOLEKAR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O ANKOLEKAR COMPOUND, DHOBIGHAT ROAD, KARWAR-581301. 6. SMT. SOLOCHANA W/O. NAGAPPA ANKOLEKAR AGE: 74 YEARS, ,OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: ANKOLEKAR COMPOUND, DHOBIGHAT ROAD, KARWAR-581301. 7. SHRI SATISH S/O. NAGAPPA ANKOLEKAR AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: ANKOLEKAR COMPOUND, DHOBIGHAT ROAD, KARWAR-581301. 8. SHRI VIDYANAND S/O. NAGAPPA ANKOLEKAR AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: ANKOLEKAR COMPOUND, DHOBIGHAT ROAD, KARWAR-581301. 9. SHRI GURUDUTT S/O. NAGAPPA ANKOLEKAR AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: ANKOLEKAR COMPOUND, DHOBIGHAT ROAD, KARWAR-581301. 10. SMT. ROOPA W/O. ASHOK BADIGERI AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: ANKOLEKAR COMPOUND, DHOBIGHAT ROAD, KARWAR-581301. 11. SMT. JYOTI W/O. RAMAKRISHNA ANKOLEKAR AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: ANKOLEKAR COMPOUND, DHOBIGHAT ROAD, KARWAR-581301. 12. SMT. ARCHANA W/O. PRASHANT SHETTI AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: ANKOLEKAR COMPOUND, DHOBIGHAT ROAD, KARWAR-581301. …ACCUSED
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2740-DB CCC No. 100286 of 2023
13. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALURU-560001. …PROFORMA RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. S.H. MITTALKOD, ADVOCATE FOR A1;
SRI. RAGHVENDRA A. PUROHIT, ADVOCATE FOR A2 & A3;
SRI. M.C. HUKKERI, ADVOCATE FOR A4;
SRI. VENKATESH KHARVI AND SRI. K.L. PATIL, ADVOCATES FOR A5-A10;
SRI. VENKATESH M. KHARVI, ADVOCATE FOR A6, A11 & A12; SRI.
PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, AGA FOR PROFORMA RESPONDENT)
THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA,1950, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE CONTEMPT PETITION AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT FOR HAVING DISOBEYED THE ORDER DATED 19.06.2023, PASSED IN W.P.NO.103695/2023 (GM-CPC) PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT VIDE ANNEXURE-A, AND PASS SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING BEFORE FRAMING OF CHARGES, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
- 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2740-DB CCC No. 100286 of 2023
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD)
The complainant has filed a memo which reads as under:
“The undersigned herein most respectfully submits that the parties herein have settled the matter and in view of the settlement the complainant herein taken all his belongings from the shop. In view of the settlement between the parties herein the complainant does not intend to continue the contempt proceedings this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to drop the contempt proceedings in the interest of justice and equity.”
In the light of the above and with Sri. K.L. Patil, the
learned counsel for the contesting respondents, stating that all mutual claims have been settled, the complaint is closed.
Sd/- (B.M.SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE RSH, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 7