- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37623 RFA No. 42 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 42 OF 2007 BETWEEN: 1. IRAPPA S/O BASAPPA HANGAL AGED 45 YEARS OCC;AGRICULTURE COOLI R/O BASAPUR (M)ADUR TALUK HANGAL, DISTRICT HAVERI. 2. SMT SAVAKKA W/O IRAPPA HANGAL @ BELUR AGED 35 YEARS OCC;HOUSEHOLD WORKR/ O BASAPUR (M)ADUR,TALUK HANGAL, HAVERI DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ASHOKHARANAHALLI ASSOCIATES.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHAIRMAN K P T C L CAUVERY BHAVAN,BANGALORE. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER HESCOM,HANGAL, HAVERI DISTRICT. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER UPPER TUNGA PROJECT DIVISIONAL OFFICE RANEBENNUR HAVERI DISTRICT. 4. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA REP. BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HAVERI. …RESPONDENTS THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37623 RFA No. 42 of 2007 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT 1. The Registry has recorded that the case file was handed over to the learned counsel for the appellants for the purpose of complying with the office objections. However, the learned counsel has not returned the file. Despite the best efforts made by the Registry, there has been no response from the learned counsel. Thereafter, the matter has been posted before the Court. 2. Today, when the matter was called out, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25