Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70244 (KAR)

SMT. R. SHILPA v. SRI. N. KARTHIK

WP/3246/2024 · 2025-07-23

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28131 WP No. 3246 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 3246 OF 2024 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. R. SHILPA W/O N KARTHIK, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS D/O LATE K R RAJENDRA, R/A NO 8, B MAIN ROAD, MUNESHWARI BLOCK, PALACE GUTTAHALLI, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560003. 2. BABY UJWALA S K D/O N KARTHIK, AGED ABOUT 2 YEARS SINCE MINOR REP BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER SMT R SHILPA W/O N KARTHIK D/O LATE K R RAJENDRA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/A NO 8, B MAIN ROAD, MUNESHWARI BLOCK, PALACE GUTTAHALLI MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560003 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHESHADRI G.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. N. KARTHIK S/O LATE P NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO 2, OPPOSITE VIJAYA BHARATHI PUBLIC SCHOOL 1ST CROSS, BHUVANESHARINAGAR, K H B MAIN ROAD, R T NAGAR Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28131 WP No. 3246 of 2024 BANGALORE – 560032. 2. SMT LALITHA W/O LATE P NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO 2, OPPOSITE VIJAYA BHARATHI PUBLIC SCHOOL 1ST CROSS, BHUVANESHARINAGAR, K H B MAIN ROAD, R T NAGAR BANGALORE - 560032 …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT TO THE HONBLE JUDGE III MMTC TO PASS ORDERS ON PENDING INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS IN C.MIS.NO.57/2020 AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The present Writ Petition is filed seeking to dispose of the pending interlocutory application in Crl. Misc. No. 57 of 2020, as early as possible. 2. This petition is filed on 19.01.2024. The office has raised several objections. As the office objections were not complied with, the matter was placed before the Court on 22.07.2025. Even after 1 and a half year, the Office objections are not complied with and no representation before the Court on 22.07.2025. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for 'dismissal' today. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28131 WP No. 3246 of 2024 3. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute the matter. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39