Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70218 (KAR)

SRI R MANJUNATH v. CHANNARAYAPATTANA GRAM PANCHAYAT

WP/5322/2025 · 2025-11-03

R Nataraj

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44131 WP No. 5322 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 5322 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. R. MANJUNATH SON OF B.R. RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BALUVANAHALLI VILLAGE JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT -562101 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. OMKUMAR R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHANNARAYAPATTANA GRAM PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, CHANNARAYAPATTANA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562135 2. EXECUTIVE OFFICER, DEVANAHALLI TALUK PANCHAYAT, DEVANAHALLI TOWN, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562110. 3. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PANCHAYAT, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, DODDABALLAPUR, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-561203 4. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BANGALORE-560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.S. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3; Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44131 WP No. 5322 of 2025 SRI. H.K.KENCHEGOWDA, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER NO.BNG.RURAL/DEV/TP/165/CHA.VP/IRIGENAHALLI/KHA. VA/1574/2024-25 DATED 01.02.2025 HOLDING THAT THERE IS AN ENCROACHMENT OF ABOUT 17 GUNTAS OF LAND BELONGING TO THE PANCHAYAT BY THE PETITIONER BY THE RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 HEREIN AS PER ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the memo, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is needless to mention that if the petitioner is entitled to any other remedy, he may avail the same in accordance with law. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15