ANIL PRAKASH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/6555/2025 · 2025-06-20
Sandeep Moudgil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70211 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70211 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6555-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 20.06.2025 Anil Prakash and another … Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others … Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Shivam Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners (through Hybrid Mode). Mr. Saurabh Girdhar, AAG, Haryana. *** Sandeep Moudgil, J.
1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing the official respondent no. 2 to 4 for the protection of the life and liberty of petitioners at the hands of private respondents.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 04.06.2025 (Annexure P-7), within a time bound manner.
3. In view of the above, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/ Superintendent of Police, Karnal, Haryana to look into the representation dated 04.06.2025 (Annexure P-7) and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from today by passing a speaking order.
4. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within one week thereafter. ( Sandeep Moudgil )
Judge 20.06.2025 Rajan
Whether speaking / reasoned: YES/NO Whether Reportable: YES/NO RAJAN KUMAR 2025.06.20 21:16 I am approving this document