Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010069012019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 267 Between:
1. M.HARI BABU, OCC.WARDEN INSC BOYS HOSTEL, R/O KAKARLA VILLAGE, MARRIPUDI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DIST. 1. S BAJI VALI, PODILIVILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DIST. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT AMARAVATHI. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MADHAVA RAO NALLURI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. VINOD KUMAR PEMMASANI
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following
The Petitioner/ Accused and Respondent No.1/ Complainant are present. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.No.1 of 2025 In/and CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 267 OF 2019 M.HARI BABU, OCC.WARDEN INSC BOYS HOSTEL, R/O KAKARLA VILLAGE, MARRIPUDI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DIST. ...PETITIONER AND S BAJI VALI, PODILIVILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DIST. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT AMARAVATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
MADHAVA RAO NALLURI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
VINOD KUMAR PEMMASANI PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) followingOrder : The Petitioner/ Accused and Respondent No.1/ Complainant are IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3521] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO 2019 M.HARI BABU, OCC.WARDEN INSC BOYS HOSTEL, R/O KAKARLA ...PETITIONER S BAJI VALI, PODILIVILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DIST. PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT AMARAVATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): The Petitioner/ Accused and Respondent No.1/ Complainant are
2. An application was filed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 seeking for compromise of the case. An affidavit was also filed by the Respondent No.1 stating that the case has been compromised at the intervention of elders of both sides. 3. A Joint Memo was filed by the Petitioner and Respondent No.1 along with their respective counsels. 4. An amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- (Rupees four lakhs only) has been paid by the Petitioner to Respondent No.1. The same was recorded in the Joint Memo.Considering the settlement of the dispute between the Petitioner and Respondent No.1, the compromise is recorded. 5. Accordingly, I.A.No.1 of 2025 is allowed. 6.
The Judgment in Criminal Appeal No.54 of 2017 on the file of learned VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Markapur, dated 18.12.2018 and the Judgment in C.C.No.55 of 2016, on the file of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Podili, dated 16.02.2017 are set aside. The Petitioner/ Accused is acquitted under Section 320(8) of ‘the Cr.P.C’. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision is disposed of. No order as to costs.As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 12.09.2025 KK
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
I.A.No.1 of 2025 In/and CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 267 OF 2019
12.09.2025
KK