Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7020 (ALL)

SATYENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

CRLP/494/2025 · 2025-01-22

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:10937-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 494 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satyendra Kumar Srivastava And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. Heard Shri Pawan Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State respondent. 2. The present writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs :- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent no.1 and 2 to ensure the fair investigation, in Case Crime No. 370 of 2024, under Section 115(2), 352, 351(3), BNS, 2023, P.S. Shahganj, District Jaunpur as well as directing to the respondents to take coercive action against the accused persons mentioned in the said Case Crime No." 3. At the very outset, learned AGA submits that in the aforesaid case crime number, charge-sheet has already been forwarded to the competent court on 29.12.2024. As such, the cause of filing the writ petition no more survives. 4. In view of the categorical instructions, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition on merit. Needless to say, it is always open for the petitioners to invoke the remedy as available in law. 5. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 22.1.2025 Bhanu Digitally signed by :- BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- BHANU PRATAP KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad