Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62136 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-342 Year-2024 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== Pashupati Yadav Son of Late Shivnandan Yadav Resident Of Mohalla- Salarpur, Ward no. 9, Ps- parbatta, Dist- Khagariya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar bihar
2. The state of Bihar patna bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanju Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 17-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 342 of 2024 dated 19.08.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 109 of B.N.S. & Section 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, on secret information, the police team reached the place of occurrence and on seeing police, the petitioner started firing on them but escaped thereafter, the petitioner tried to flee but he was apprehended by the police party. On search, one country-made katta, one empty
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62136 of 2025(3) dt.17-09-2025 2/3 cartridge and two mobile phones were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is no eye-witness to alleged occurrence. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has eight criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody in this case since 20.08.2024. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. 6.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above- named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Khagaria in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 342 of 2024 with following conditions:- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62136 of 2025(3) dt.17-09-2025 3/3 cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner are liable to be cancelled. (ii) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond. 7. The application stands allowed. shivam/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T