Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70196 (PNJ)

MOHAMMAD SAAD ALIAS MUHAMMED SAAD v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/32752/2025 · 2025-08-13

Namit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 210 CRM-M-32752-2025 Date of decision : 13.08.2025 Mohammad Sadd @ Muhammed Saad ….Petitioner V/S State of Haryana ….Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. Sarfaraj Anjum Mor, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Sadar, Senior D.A.G., Haryana. **** NAMIT KUMAR , J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.34 dated 05.02.2025 registered under Section 376(2) of Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station Model Town, Panipat. 2. Reply by way of an affidavit of Sh. Satish Kumar, HPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, HQ, Panipat, on behalf of the respondent-State, filed in the Registry is taken on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that, in pursuance to the order dated 18.06.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and has joined the investigation. 4. Learned State counsel, on instructions, has not disputed the aforesaid fact and submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for further investigation. VINOD KOTHIYAL 2025.08.13 14:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M-32752-2025 -2- 5. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed and the interim relief granted to the petitioner vide order dated 18.6.2025 is made absolute subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C./482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 13.08.2025 (NAMIT KUMAR) kothiyal JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No VINOD KOTHIYAL 2025.08.13 14:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document