245 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6525-2025 Date of Decision: 03.07.2025 Balraj Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. Gulrej Khan, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. M.S. Toor, AAG, Punjab. *** RAJESH BHARDWAJ , J. (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for directing respondent Nos.2 to 4 to take action on the representation dated 21.05.2025 (Annexure P-6) for protecting the life and personal liberty of the petitioner and his family members from the hands of respondent Nos.5 and 6 and their gang members. 2. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had been granted the security by the respondent-State on 07.09.2021 (Annexure P-1). He submits that the petitioner has been provided two constables one from the armed forces and another from the local police, however, threat is not only to the petitioner but to his family members also. Thus, the security provided is not sufficient. He, thus, submits that petitioner needs more security personnel to ensure the protection of the petitioner and his family members. 3. Notice of motion. Parveen Kumar 2025.07.04 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6525-2025 -2- 4. Mr. M.S. Toor, AAG, Punjab appears and accepts notice on behalf of the State. He submits that the security provided to the petitioner is continuing and there is no laxity in continuing the same. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that threat perception to the petitioner and his family members has not been taken into consideration and petitioner has already filed the representation dated 21.05.2025 (Annexure P-6) to the ADGP (Security), Punjab but the same has not been taken into consideration. 6. On hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusal of the record, this Court is of the opinion that threat perception as apprehended by the petitioner be re-looked into and grievances raised by the petitioner in his representation dated 21.05.2025 (Annexure P-6) be taken into consideration and appropriate decision be taken upon the same by the respondent-authorities within a period of two weeks from today. 7. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) 03.07.2025 JUDGE Parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No Parveen Kumar 2025.07.04 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document