THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION OSMANBAD DISTRICT OSMANABAD v. TRIMBAK RANGNATH PAWAR
CA/3258/2023 · 2025-11-10
Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70193 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70193 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
35 delay.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 35 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3256 OF 2023 IN FAST/8008/2023 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION OSMANABAD AND ORS VERSUS DNYANOBA VITHOBA PAWAR … WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3252 OF 2023 IN FAST/8016/2023 … WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3258 OF 2023 IN FAST/8005/2023 … WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3254 OF 2023 IN FAST/8013/2023 … WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3250 OF 2023 IN FAST/8002/2023 … Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Arun Hanumant Koralkar Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S.P. Salgar h/f Mr. Anant Ramahari Devakate A.G.P. for Respondent/State : Mr. S.V. Hange ... CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 10.11.2025 PER COURT : The applicants seek to condone delay ranging from 189 to 205 days in preferring the appeals.
2. For the reasons stated in the applications, it is desirable to condone the delay. I find no mala fides on the part of the applicant in preferring the appeals belatedly. The delay stands condoned.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) mkd/- 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:30788