- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27087 MFA No. 8850 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.8850 OF 2013(MV-I) BETWEEN: 1. SRI RAGHUPATHI NAYAK AGED 60 YEARS S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA NAYAK R/O SRI DEVI KIRAN ALAPEPADUPU, PADIL POST, MANGALORE - 575 007. D.K. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. PUNDIKAI ISHWARA BHAT, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI CHARANRAJ SHETTY AGED 28 YEARS S/O. RAGHUNATH SHETTY R/O. DOOR NO.6-51, THANDOLIGE JEPPINAMOGARU, MANGALORE TALUK D.K. - 575 009. 2. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE: BEAUTY PLAZA BALMATTA ROAD, HAMPANKATTA MANGALORE - 575 001 REP BY ITS MANAGER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. O.MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR R2, R1 SERVED) Digitally signed by ANNAPURNA G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27087 MFA No. 8850 of 2013 THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 29.01.2013 PASSED IN MVC NO.1724/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE MEMBER, MACT - III & II ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, D.K., MANGALORE, DISMISSING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for appellant is absent. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 is present. There is no representation for the appellant in the morning and in the afternoon session. Sufficient opportunity is given. The matter is of the year 2013. It appears appellant is not interested to prosecute the matter. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (UMESH M ADIGA) JUDGE AG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32