Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70187 (KAR)

SRI. K. RAMACHANDRA v. SMT. SHUBHA KALYAN

CCC/675/2024 · 2025-11-03

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44179-DB CCC No. 675 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.675 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. K. RAMACHANDRA S/O. LATE KAMBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3, ANEESH ADITYA NILAYA, 1ST CROSS, 1ST MAIN, KUVEMPU ROAD, BYADARAHALLI, MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU-560 091. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. CHRISTOPHER STANLEY W., ADV. FOR SRI. JEEVAN KUMAR B. S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SHUBHA KALYAN THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44179-DB CCC No. 675 of 2024 TUMKUR-572 101. 2. SRI. VISHWANTH THASILDAR, KUNIGAL TALUK, KUNIGAL-572 130. …ACCUSED 3. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. …PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SMT. SHWETHA KRISHNAPPA, AGA FOR GOVT. ADV. FOR PROFORMA R3, A1 & A2.) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 FOR WILLFULL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 06.02.2024, PASSED IN W.P.NO.15148/2020 (KLR-RES). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44179-DB CCC No. 675 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) This contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 06.02.2024, passed in W.P. No.15148/2020, wherein the learned Single Judge has directed the respondents in the writ proceedings to collect the revenue and to cancel the forfeiture ('¥ÀqÀ') by removing the same from the revenue records. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate has filed compliance memo along with the order of the Deputy Commissioner dated 02.11.2025, which indicates that the Deputy Commissioner has passed an order to remove the forfeiture ('¥ÀqÀ') from the revenue records. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate on instruction from accused No.2- Smt. Rashmi, Tahsildar, Kunigal Taluk, who is present before the Court submits that pursuant to the directions of the Deputy Commissioner, name of the complainant will be restored in the RTC, within a period of two weeks. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44179-DB CCC No. 675 of 2024 4. In view of the aforesaid submission, we are of the view that the order of the learned Single Judge has been complied. The contempt proceeding is dropped. Notice issued to the accused stands discharged. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE PN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 1