Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70184 (KAR)

SMT SHYAMALA S MADDODI v. THE STATE BY

CRL.P/7913/2023 · 2025-08-06

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30740 CRL.P No. 7913 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7913 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SMT SHYAMALA S. MADDODI W/O ANANDA.P AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT 40, MANJUSHREE KAVYA, 5TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, 4TH PHASE, KAMAKYA, 7TH BLOCK, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085 AND ALSO @ SHETTIGAR, NILL, BENGALURU CITY, KARNATAKA - 560085. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVARAJU H B., ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE BY WILSON GARDEN POLICE STATION, BENGALURU-01. REP. BY. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE, BANGALORE - 01 2. SMT. C.K. RAMYA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, ASST. SECURITY AND VIGILANTE OFFICER, BMTC CENTRAL OFFICE, Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30740 CRL.P No. 7913 of 2023 BMTC BUILDING, SHANTHINAGARA, BENGALURU CITY, KARNATAKA- 560027 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. N. ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP FOR R1/STATE.) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR DATED 27.07.2023 IN CR.NO.182/2023 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 420, 465, 468, 471, 409, 120B AND 34 OF IPC, 1860 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT / WILSONGARDEN POLICE STATION IN RESPECT OF PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.3 ON THE FILE OF THE 3RD ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU CITY, VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioner. 2. No representation for petitioner even in the afternoon session. 3. This matter is of the year 2023. 4. Vide order dated 25.07.2025, as a last chance, a week's time was granted to do the needful, failing which - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30740 CRL.P No. 7913 of 2023 necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. 5. Despite the same, needful has not been done. It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. 6. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13