Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70171 (PAT)

Neelmani Kumar @ Sonu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./58490/2025 · 2025-09-22

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58490 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-263 Year-2017 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Neelmani Kumar @ Sonu Kumar, Son of Ram Naresh Kumar @ Naresh Rai @ Ram Naresh Roy Resident Of Village- Korlahiya, P.S.- Runi Saidpur, Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sagar Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 22-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 263 of 2017, instituted under Section 30, 30(g), 38(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. There is recovery of 44.28 litre foreign liquor from an Alto Car. The apprehended co-accused, namely, Mohan Kumar disclosed that the said liquor belongs to the petitioner and other co-accused persons. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of disclosure statement made by the apprehended co- accused. Petitioner was neither present on the spot nor he has any Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58490 of 2025(2) dt.22-09-2025 2/2 concern with the seized liquor. Nothing has been recovered from possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent which is not of similar nature. Petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the investigation and trial. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the Petitioner, above-named, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise I, Sitamarhi in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 263 of 2017, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023. rakhi/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J.) U T