IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14344 of 2025 ====================================================== Smt. Geeta Devi W/o Late Ram Chandra Choudhary, Resident of Village Sindhiya Bujurg, Ward No. 12, P.S. Vibhitipur, District-Samastipur, present Resident of Bairiyarpur, West Ward No. 1, P.S. Khodavanpur (Khudabanpur), District-Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reform Department, Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate, Begusarai. 3. The District Superintendent of Police, Begusarai. 4. The Circle Officer, (Khodavanpur) Khudabandpur, District Begusarai. 5. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Manjhaul, Begusarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kameshwar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav, AC to GA-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 09-09-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “(i) For a direction upon the respondents authorities to consider and grant/ constitute/registered jamabandi (mutation) namely Geeta Devi on account of registered deed in Khata No. 281, Khesra No. 1297/1298-2093 mouza Bara area 9.7 & 2 dec. and thana No. 69. (ii) For a direction upon respondent no. 4 consider and grant jamabandi on account of Patna High Court CWJC No.14344 of 2025(2) dt.09-09-2025 2/3 order of respondent no. 5 passed vide order dated 23.07.2024. (iii) For a direction upon the respondents to grant Jamabandi above named and record register no. 2 with all consequence benefits. (iv) To pass any other order/ order shape of a consequential reliefs to which petitioner may be found to be legally entitle to in facts and circumstances of instant case of land. (v) for issuance of any relief/reliefs as deem fit and proper.” 3. Learned State counsel at the outset submits that the writ petition is bereft of the essential documents and in that background, no conclusion can be arrived at. 4. A perusal of the writ petition shows that the submission put forward by the learned State counsel is justified. Neither the details of the person who executed the sale deed is/are on record nor the order of the Circle Officer, Khudabanpur, Begusarai which led the DCLR, Manjhaul to pass an order dated 13.07.2024 in the Mutation Appeal Case No. 97 of 2023-24 (Geeta Devi vs. Circle Officer, Khudabanpur) is there. Patna High Court CWJC No.14344 of 2025(2) dt.09-09-2025 3/3 5. In that background, the writ petition stands dismissed with a cost of Rs. 200/- to be deposited with the Patna High Court Legal Services Committee with liberty to file fresh petition alongwith all the relevant documents. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U