Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52787 WP No. 36239 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 36239 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. SHRUTHI W/O PRASANA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, DELEGATE OF THAGACHEGERE VIVIVODESHA PRATHAMIKA GRAMEENA KRUSHI SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITA THAGACHEGERE, KASABA HOBLI, CHENNAPATNA TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH - 562 160. 2. K. JAYARAMU S/O KADEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, DELEGATE OF MALURUPATNA VIVIVODESHA PRATHAMIKA GRAMEENA KRUSHI SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITA THAGACHEGERE, KASABA HOBLI, CHENNAPATNA TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH - 562 160. 3. M.L. SHIVASWAMY S/O LINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, DELEGATE OF AKKURU VIVIVODESHA PRATHAMIKA GRAMEENA KRUSHI SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITA, AKKURU, KASABA HOBLI, CHENNAPATNA TALUK, RAMNAGAR - 562 159. 4. SIDDEGOWDA P K S/O KARUGUNDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
Digitally signed by PRASHANTH N V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52787 WP No. 36239 of 2025
DELEGATE OF SOGALA VIVIVODESHA PRATHAMIKA GRAMEENA KRUSHI SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITA, SOGALA, KASABA HOBLI, CHENNAPATNA TALUK, RAMNAGAR - 562 159
5. MOHAN CHANDRA N B S/O LATE BOREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, DELEGATE OF IGGALURU VIVIVODESHA PRATHAMIKA GRAMEENA KRUSHI SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITA, IGGALURU, KASABA HOBLI, CHENNAPATNA TALUK, RAMNAGAR - 562 159. 6. K. P. SHASIDHAR S/O PUTTASWAMYGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS DELEGATE OF HUNASANAHALLI VIVIVODESHA PRATHAMIKA GRAMEENA KRUSHI SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITA, HUNASANAHALLI, KASABA, VIRUPAKSHA HOBLI, CHENNAPATNA TALUK, RAMNAGAR - 562 159. 7. K. MANJUNATH S/O LATE KENCHAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, DELEGATE OF CHANNAPATNA TOWN VIVIVODESHA PRATHAMIKA GRAMEENA KRUSHI SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITA, CHENNAPATNA TOWN, RAMNAGAR - 562 159. 8. M.C.H MEHARISH S/O M.H. CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, DELEGATE OF MATHIKERE VIVIVODESHA PRATHAMIKA GRAMEENA KRUSHI SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITA, MATHIKERE, KASABA HOBLI,
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52787 WP No. 36239 of 2025
CHENNAPATNA TALUK, RAMNAGAR - 562 159 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. TARUN K.M., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SARAVANA S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPT. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY, 3RD FLOOR, T.T.M.C. 'A' BLOCK, SHANTHI NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 027, REPT. BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/ ELECTION OFFICER, BANGALORE DISTRICT KANDHAYAM BHAVAN BANGALORE - 560 001
4. RETURNING OFFICER ELECTION BENGALURU DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK REGISTERED OFFICE AT. NO.2, PAMPAMAHAKAVI ROAD, CHAMARAJPETE, BENGALURU - 560 018
5.
THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OP SOCIETIES RAMANAGAR SUB DIVISION, RAMNAGAR-562159
6. BANGALORE DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK REPT. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR HAVING THEIR REGISTERED OFFICE AT. NO.2, PAMPAMAHAKAVI ROAD, CHAMARAJPETE, BENGALURU - 560 018. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REGISTERED CO-OP SOCIETY
7. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OP SOCIETIES RAMNAGAR - 562 138
8. JOINT REGISTRAR CO-OP SOCIETIES MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESHWARAM,
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52787 WP No. 36239 of 2025
BENGALURU - 560 003. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH .D. NIAK, AGA FOR R1, R3-5, R7 & 8 SRI. NATARAJ BABA .K., ADVOCATE FOR C/R6 (AB) SRI. A. DEVARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R2 (AB))
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF PROHIBITION RESTRAINING RESPONDENT NOS. 5, 7 AND 8 OR ANY OTHER STATUTORY AUTHORITY, FROM INITIATING, ENTERTAINING, OR ACTING UPON ANY DISQUALIFICATION PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER INCLUDING SUO-MOTA PROCEEDINGS, FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF THE PETITIONER-SOCIETY OR ITS DELEGATE PENDING ELECTIONS TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT TO BE SCHEDULED ON 07.12.2025 AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo reporting that the matter has become infructuous.
Memo is placed on record.
Hence, the petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
SD/- (M G UMA) JUDGE
BH CT:VS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 25